Being an Indian abroad. Part II

 My article, « Being an Indian abroad », posted on Facebook & Twitter, triggered a few reactions.

 Obviously, America is not only fast food, artificial lights, cars and a superficial vitality. There is certain openness about America, a willingness of the American people to listen to other points of view, which is unique. Yes, America is also a land of freedom where in the last three hundred years, people from all nationalities, all social classes, have been given the chance to make it good. And immigrants have in turn responded to this unique trust by giving the United States their 100% allegiance and energies, which makes it today the leading industrial and military nation in the world. One finds too a sense of collectiveness, a caring for the others, which gives America some of the best road system in the world and first-class public amenities, such as the community centers found in many American cities.

 But is America really the benevolent, casteless society that some of facebook members are convinced it is ? Well, its true that hey have reelected Obama, a unique phenomenon, which shows America’s openness, but still, I am not sure. For one, what the White Americans did to the Blacks not that long ago, must be ranking amongst some of the saddest deeds perpetuated by one class of humanity on another; not to speak of the terrible and shameful treatment inflicted upon the hapless Red Indians, the original inhabitants of their land, a karma that the US will have to pay sooner or later. There are also a lot of inequalities in the States: extremely rich people and some incredibly poor folks, mostly Blacks, for such a country of tremendous wealth. American journalists and human rights activists like to highlight the “oppressed” condition of women in India. But as early as the late sixties, India elected democratically a woman Prime Minister, the highest post of the nation – and that for nearly twenty years. Can the country of triumphant feminism and gender equality boast of a woman President? Hillary Clinton did not make it. The problem is that most Indians suffer too much from an inferiority complex vis à vis the West, to point this out to the Americans who are constantly criticizing India for its human rights in Kashmir and Gujarat

 Yes, in America one enjoys the liberty to do whatever one wants without the red tape, bureaucracy and heavy taxation that one is subjected to in India, or even in industrialized countries such as France. But after 11th September 2001, freedoms have been heavily curtailed in the US, especially if you have a brown skin, as many Indians, Hindus or Sikhs, are finding out today, being mistaken by ignorant Americans for Pakistanis, Afghanis or Saudis. Today, each of your movements is watched in the US, as there are video cameras everywhere, not only at airports, but also at traffic lights, in stores, at cinemas. Everything is known about you, thanks to computerization – and we even once heard on the PA of Atlanta airport: “ you can go to jail for something you say, even as a joke” ! Compare this to India: I have lived here for 40 years, I have gone to the most remote places, traveled to sacred spots with my cameras, tape recorder and white face. And never once have I been aggressed, never once has my passport been asked in the streets (try traveling in the subway in Paris if you have a brown face and a leather jacket), never once have I been mugged at late nights in Delhi, Mumbai or Chennai, whereas in Washington, the capital of the ‘land of freedom’, we were told not to go out alone in certain parts after 8 PM.

 Some of the posts dealt with the extraordinary “religious freedom one can enjoy in the US, where nobody bothers whether you are a Jew, a Hindu, or a Christian”. Fair enough. But let’s put it that way: the American population is overwhelmingly Christian and nobody there finds anything to say that the President of the United States is sworn in on the Bible, or that in some states a Christian prayer is uttered before the start of the school. India has a thumping Hindu majority (80%), but imagine the uproar if Mr. Manmohan Singh had been sworn in on the Bhagavad-Gita  ! And remember what happened when Murli Manohar Joshi wanted to introduce the chanting of the Vandana Saraswati in schools. Yet, India had three Muslim Presidents since independence, a Sikh PM, when Sikhs constitute 3% of the total population and a Christian Supremo, who is just an elected MP, when Christians are only 2% in India. Would that be possible in the US?

 OK, some of you have a point: when I say that all Indians settled in the US should regroup themselves under a “Hindu American banner”, it does look as if I want to exclude Christians, Muslim and Sikh Indians. Indeed, most of the protesting posts, were from Christians, Muslims and Sikhs. But the question is: do these minorities really want to be part of India? Let’s answer the objections from Christians first. One Christian reader tells me “Christians have no freedom in India, look what’s happened in Orissa recently where churches were burnt”. True, but first it should be pointed out that most of these incidents are between converted tribals or low castes and non-converted one. Moreover, this is an isolated case and our friend disregards what the Christians have done to Hindus over the centuries. The first Christian community in the world, that of the Syrian Christians, settled in India in the first century. They were not only allowed to practice their religion in peace, but they prospered here, whereas at the same time they were persecuted in Rome and later in many Arabic countries. But when Vasco de Gama landed in India in the 16th century, the Portuguese, with the active collaboration of many of the Indian Christians, unleashed a reign of terror in Goa and some parts of Kerala, crucifying Brahmins, razing temples, forcibly marrying their soldiers to Goanese women. The British, even if they did not use such violent means, gave a free hand to missionaries to convert huge parts of India, particularly in the North-East. Today, American or Australian dollars are used to still convert unethically, by using the economic incentive amongst tribals and untouchables, teaching the new converts to hate their culture and customs and creating a spirit of separatism, as the Christian Bodo and Mizo militants have shown.

 A few Sikh friends also resented my not having mentioned Sikkism. Let me quote straightaway from Sri Aurobindo: “ The Sikh Khalsa was an astonishingly original and novel creation and its face was turned not to the past but to the future. Apart and singular in its theocratic head and democratic soul and structure, it was the first attempt to combine the deepest elements of Islam and Vedanta. But it could not create between the spirit and the external life the transmitting medium of a rich creative thought and culture. And thus hampered and deficient it began and ended with narrow local limits, achieved intensity but no power of expansion…”

Unfortunately, the Sikhs, because they had to defend themselves against the terrible persecutions by the Muslims, became a militant religion, adopting hawkish habits, which they kept, even in time of peace. And they also retained some of the more negative sides of Islam: intolerance, or feeling of persecution, thus cutting themselves from the mainstream spirit of Hindu tolerance from which they anyway came, and where they might ultimately go back.  But do they not come from the great Hindu family? Has not till lately every good Hindu family donated one of their sons to Sikhism? Do not Hindus, still today go to Gurdwaras? Yet today, many expatriate Sikhs want to have nothing to do with Hinduism, and sometimes even with India. Badrinath, a holy place to Hindus and Hemkunt Saheb, the most important place of pilgrimage for Sikhs after the Golden Temple, are only separated by a few kilometers. You will find Hindus taking the very arduous trek up to Hemkunt Saheb, but today hardly any Sikhs bother to take the bus to Badrinath. By cutting itself from its roots, Sikkism might be running adrift and lose its relevance.

 What about Indian Muslims? Today we see, even though they benefit in India from a freedom they would not have in Saudi Arabia, or even in Pakistan, that Indian Muslims often feel their first allegiance goes to Islam and not to India. The irony of it all is that Muslims invaded India, raped it repeatedly, ran it with an iron and bloody hand, attempted to make of India a totally Islamic country by forcibly converting millions of Hindus – and today they manage to portray themselves in the eyes of the world as the persecuted ! When fed-up by centuries of Muslim oppression, persecutions, ostracism and separatism, upper caste, as well as lower caste Hindus in Gujarat burst out in a frenzy of unforgivable violence after the burning of 57 innocent Hindus in a train by a Muslim mob, Indian Muslims cry for revenge:  “I invite people to commit crimes against Hindus in Gujarat”, said one of the emails from a Muslim gentleman. Another Muslim lady, Shabnam Hashmi, has been going around all the United  States, saying that it was the RSS who killed the hapless kar sevaks in the Sabamarti Express – and she got the ear of all US mainstream newspapers, such as the NYT, as well as many Government-backed human right agencies. Are American that stupid to believe such a terrible lie ? Isn’t it time that the Indian Muslim community, both abroad and in India, most of whom are Hindus who had to convert by force, make a choice between Babar, a man who destroyed everything which was good, beautiful and holy and lived by the power of violence and Ram, who believed in the equality of all and gave-up all riches and honors of the world because he thought his bother deserved the throne more than him ?

 Another strong objection from some readers: religion divides. First let me say that Hinduism, as Sri Aurobindo or Vivekananda, or Shri Ramakrishna, envisioned it, is not a religion but a living spirituality which has given to the world – and still gives it today – wonderful tools: hata-yoga copied all over this planet, meditation, or pranayama, which, says Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, the founder of the Art of Living Foundation, which teaches pranayama in 150 countries, “can be practiced by anybody, whatever their nationality and religion”. Secondly, at a time when the two largest monotheistic religions of the world, Islam and Christianity still claim that their God is the only true one and it is still their right in the 21st century to convert, or even kill in the name of Jesus Christ, or Mohamed, Hindus, through the extraordinary concept of the avatar, recognize that God manifests himself at different times, in different countries, under different names and thus grant to everybody the right to worship God under any form. This is a very precious  spiritual (and not religious) knowledge which has been lost to the world and which, even the most humble Hindu peasant spontaneously practices.

 It is also true that things in India are not as they should be. Hindus there are not united, India is divided along caste and religious lines by unscrupulous politicians. Yes, Hindus can also be racists, as one reader remarked; they do suffer at the same time, as another one commented, from a big inferiority complex, as well as one of superiority, quite an achievement! Yes, it is as well correct that expatriate Indians do often tend to become more conscious of their roots than India Indians: they will send their children to learn Bharata Natyam and will remember all the festivals. Good: there is a whole generation of upper middle class kids in India who are so desperately aping the worst of the West, that they are lost for India. Yes, Hindus can on top pf that be selfish, passive, cowardly, miserly, whereas many of them are extremely rich. But nevertheless, they remain a wonderful people, alive with an inbred joy and spirituality.

 Contrary to what one of the readers assert, there is a definite atmosphere in India, something special, something unique, which is there nowhere else in the world. Those of you who spent a lot of time abroad, will notice a certain quality in the atmosphere as soon as you enter India, if you are a little sensitive. There is nothing miraculous about it, it juts springs from millions of sages, yogis, thinkers, sadhus, avatars having incarnated themselves on this sacred land of India and meditated there and preached love and compassion. This can be felt even more strongly at certain locations: on the banks of Benares, in Rishikesh or Haridwar, in Madurai, or even of all the places, in Srinagar, where there is still today a strong spiritual atmosphere, maybe because it was once the cradle of Shivaism.

 So: Indian Americans or Hindu Americans ? To start with, there are already Indian Americans, those that Columbus mistook for real Indians and you can’t usurp their names. Secondly it ultimately depends on the Christians, the Sikhs and the Muslims, who in the last few decades, have drifted more and more from the Indian psyche, striving to strike a fundamental identity of their own. India and Hinduism always gave them space to express themselves and left them the full freedom of religious expression. But in return, Muslims and Christians persecuted the Hindus; and Sikhs, let themselves be used by Pakistan to harm India’s collective unity. We have also seen that the numerous Indian Americans associations in the US, where there are indeed Muslim, Christians and Sikh Indians, are frequently paralyzed by these three groups, who although they are very small in numbers, often work against India and the Hindu majority by creating such forums as the South Asian journalist Association, which is sometimes used as an anti-Hindu/India forum by Pakistanis, Bangladeshis and Indian Muslims.

 Thus, if Hindus in the United States regroup themselves under a “Hindu American” label it might prompt the three minorities to wake-up to the reality of a stronger, overwhelmingly Hindu majority. On top of that, as I have already said, it will give a clear-cut identity to Indians in the States, dissociating them from the Pakistanis, the Bangladeshis, the Saudis, or the Afghans, who have a much less friendly attitude towards the West than Hindus. It will also help make known to the average American the extraordinary achievements of the Hindu community in the US, which must be the most upwardly mobile – and perhaps the richest – community in America. Lastly, it will help the Indian Government, by creating a powerful and effective lobby in the US, free from the shackles imposed by the Christian, Sikh and Muslim Indians. Ultimately, it will up to these three minorities to decide whether they want to re-join this great family that is “Induism”. For we should then give back to ‘Hindus’ it proper meaning: Indus from the civilization of the valley of Indus, probably the most ancient civilization of the world still active today. Once upon a time, Indian Christians, Parsis, Muslims and Hindus were called ‘Indus’ by the invaders without differentiation of caste and religion. Is it not time to put back this habit into practice?

 Finally, is America going to be perpetually the Eldorado that still make Indians dream ? Not sure. There are certain signs which show that the US economy is not fully recovering: the slump in the stock market, the packing up of half of Silicon Valley, the near bankruptcy of many American airlines and banks, and more than that, the eroding of the cocksure confidence of Americans. There are bound to be more terrorist attacks on the US in the next few years, as Samuel Huntington’s prophecy of a “clash of civilization” between Islam and the West, with China siding with Islam (lets us not forget that Beijing already gave Pakistan the technology to build its nuclear weapons) and Hindu India allied with the West, will prove more and more true. This in turn will trigger more panic, more loss of confidence amongst Americans and eventually a stock market crash on the lines of the one which happened in 1929.

 On the other hand, India, this “Third World country”, has learnt to live with Islamic terrorism, its people do not panic as Americans do, it has a relatively stable stock market, its software business is still expanding and is beginning to offer salaries which will compete with the West. Could it be that this great brain drain towards America could be reversed and that NRI’s start coming back to their country of origin in search of greener pastures? One could even dream: today one still sees this huge humiliating queues in front of the US embassy in Delhi, where visa applicants are treated like cattle. Will we one day witness Americans waiting in line in front of the Indian embassy in Washington to obtain working visas in

India ? It will happen my friends. One day.

 FRANCOIS GAUTIER

 

About these ads

9 responses to “Being an Indian abroad. Part II

  1. God Bless you for this wonderful article every word of which is true. Dr. K.C.Haridas, Mumbai

  2. Raghavendra Puranam

    It gives me great pride to see someone like you who is taking out time to make Hindus realise their goodness. Thank you. Hope you create inspiration in many more Hindus.

  3. Very interesting article indeed. The tragedy is,it is the Hindus who are opposed to any Hindu religious identity! One can forget Shabnam Hashmi for the propaganda against RSS but Lalu Prasad Yadav & many Hindus also tried to prove that the Godhra train fire was caused by some Hindu outfits! The anti-Hindu sentiments otherwise known as “secularism” is the reason for negative propaganda in the US after the Gujarat riots of 2002 and subsequent refusal of Visa for the visit of Gujarat CM, Mr.Modi. The problem seems to be that the Hindu secularist has lost identity. Something terrible could happen to the country and the Hindus if organisations like RSS etc do not function & uphold the cause of the Hindus. When the proselytizing religions finish their jobs, one would like to ask the fanatic secularist Hindu if he would be able to accept the other religion & his name changed from Sharma to say Salim and so on. The Fanatic secularist Hindu is in a state of somnambulism and can not see any danger to himself or the Hindus and opposes all Hindu religious outfits as backward and obscurantist. A revival of the Hindu psyche is required before the Hindus can feel safe the country of their majority!

  4. Indians had begun coming back after the Indo-US Civilian Nuclear Deal but then the Leftists/Maoists who have infiltrated everywhere (eg NAC) have stunted India’s growth. Indians from across the globe would love to come back home. Its a matter of getting the reforms in place.
    Sikhs got estranged after the 1984 riots. They always wanted to assert their separate identity, but after the carnage the wounds have still not healed. Yet, Hindus and Sikhs are so similar that, as you say, they might ultimately come back to their mother religion – Hinduism.
    Will Americans stand in queues outside Indian Embassy in DC? Well it is not impossible but we will need to work very hard, systematically to attain that kind of growth.

  5. It was a nice article. Hope many more Indians read this article and know more about India, its greatness.

  6. Amazing article. I appreciate your effort and knowledge in writing such an elaborated article about India.

  7. Saurabh Shankar

    Interesting read as it presents a very interesting perspective. But there are certain things mentioned in the article that I don’t agree with. Even though I am hopeful (like the blogger) of the times when foreign nationals will line up outside Indian embassy for work visas, I don’t agree with the blog or with some comments completely.

    First and foremost, equating “secularism” with “anti-Hindu” sentiments clearly shows how skewed our perception is with regards to the term secularism. Essentially, secularism means prohibition of discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, race or sex. Equating secularism with anti-Hindu sentiments just negates the existence of such a concept.

    According to me, there are already too many fractions that exist in India or amongst the Indian expatriates, so much so that, we don’t need any more such “HIndu-labels” (or for that matter – Muslims, Sikhs, Bengalis, Marathis, South Indians, North Indians or any other label). What we probably need (if at all we need) is a single “Indian” label that essentially talks or pushes the agenda which are in greater interest of India as a country, not to appease a certain section of the society.

    Also, it is interesting to note that we easily get riled up when someone (read American journalists) criticizes about the “oppressed” situation that Indian women faces, whereas the truth is that we still give examples of 1970′s and one woman when it comes to showcasing gender equality in India, while completely overlooking the diktats of Khap Panchayats (the India of 2012) advocating for the lowering of legal marriage of girls because they feel that is a better way to reduce the number of cases of sexual offences than punishing the responsible (youths). Isn’t it hypocrisy that at one hand India still faces rampant cases of sex-selective abortion while at the other hand we quote of 1 woman PM to project the case of gender equality?

    I personally feel that the dream that the blogger has envisioned can only be possible when the Indian growth becomes more inclusive. The first step in that direction could probably be developing an attitude of accepting our flaws and mistakes rather than getting riled up, on getting criticized. Only when we accept that there exists a problem, can we begin working towards removing it.

  8. America is a country of extreme entitlement with libert and justice for some but a high degree of xenophobia

  9. कोई भी इंसान या नस्ल किसी भी देश में सैकड़ों साल रहने के बाद भी उस देश के प्रति अपनी जिम्मेदारी को दूसरे दर्जे पर रखे तो क्या संज्ञा दी जायेगी ?
    सारे अधिकार वो देश दे , देश के नागरिक सारे सम्मान दें , यहाँ तक कि वैवाहिक संबंधों को भी देश स्वीकार करे , ऐसा देश जो अपनी पूजा पद्धति तक पर जा के सहनशील रहे उसके बाद भी एक सेकंड में सब भुला दिया जाए तो क्या सोचने समझने को रह जाता है , ( ये तब, जब मूल देश इतनी सुविधा ना दे ) , हिन्दू जिस देश में गए वहाँ के नियमों और अपनी जिम्मेदारी को ईमानदारी से समझते हुए अप्रवासी भारतीयों ने वैश्विक-नागरिक कैसा हो उसका जीता-जगता उदाहरण प्रत्येक देश में बनने का प्रयास किया जो निश्चय ही गर्व की बात है , क्या कारण है कि जो देश सारी जिम्मेदारी अपने मूल-नागरिकों की कीमत पर निभा रहा है उस देश के प्रति सोचने का एक सेकेण्ड का वक़्त भी नहीं , सेकड़ों साल भी कम पड़े ? क्रिकेट मैच एक बहुत ही छोटा सा उदाहरण है, पर भारत के जीतने पर आम जिंदगी में आम हिन्दुओं को वर्षों साथ चाय पीने के बाद क्या कुछ नहीं पढ़ना होता है, उन आँखों में जो वर्षों से साथ हैं ? कितना और सहनशील होना होगा ? अपनी सभ्यता कि रक्षा करना तो विश्व के प्रत्येक नागरिक का नैसर्गिक कर्तव्य है तो फिर कई प्रश्न हैं जिनके उत्तर उन्हें देने होंगे जो सेकड़ों वर्ष भारत मंक रहने के बाद ‘’ मेरा भारत महान ‘’ कहने में शर्म महसूस करना तो दूर , आरोप और जड़ देते हैं |
    संस्मरण : मेरा भांजा दस साल का था अमेरिका में जन्म होने से अमेरिकन हुआ, यहाँ आया तो बोला , ‘’ आय लव अमेरिका ‘’ , दोस्त से रहा गया टोक दिया ‘’ पहले “ आय लव इंडिया “ फिर “ आय लव अमेरिका “ भांजे ने जवाब दिया ‘’ सॉरी “ आय बोर्न इन अमेरिका सो इट्स माय फर्स्ट लव एंड आय डू लव इंडिया विथ द सेम स्पिरिट बट फर्स्ट लव इस फर्स्ट लव | फिर मुझे बोला “ एम् आय राईट “ मामा जी ? छोटे से बच्चे का वैश्विक – दर्शन मुझे वैश्विक बना गया |
    पर हम कभी नहीं सुन पाते ये शब्द उनसे जो यहाँ सेकड़ों सालों से रह रहे हैं , पुश्तें गुजर गईं ?, कमी है तो वैश्विक-दर्शन की , केवल हिन्दू ही हैं जो सम्पूर्ण विश्व को एक घर मानते और जीते हैं और वैश्विक स्तर के नागरिकों का निर्माण करते हैं , फिर भी आरोप हिंदुत्व पर ? हर बात की एक सीमा होती है सीमा से परे जाने पर घटनाएं घट जाती हैं , केवल चर्चा रह जाती है की कोन गलत कोन सही , प्रयास होना चाहिए की सीमाओं का अतिक्रमण ना हो , पर जो सीमा का इतना अतिक्रमण करें की ट्विन-टावर को हजारों मासूमों की कब्रगाह में बदल दें ? उनसे क्या उम्मीद राखी जा सकती है ? आप ही बताएं

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s